|
|
Post by qwerty on May 27, 2010 19:50:48 GMT 1
  C&C is welcome - especially on legs and arm |
|
crae
Enthusiast
Posts: 13
|
Post by crae on May 27, 2010 20:45:32 GMT 1
I think the musculature seems a bit exaggerated, almost like there's extra muscles where they don't belong and the skin is missing. Otherwise pretty amazing level of detail and accuracy  |
|
|
|
Post by qwerty on May 27, 2010 21:36:48 GMT 1
Well I should mention that it was muscle study, so he doesn't have skin.
|
|
|
|
Post by wasa on May 27, 2010 21:37:22 GMT 1
Anatomy looks good over all, I don't see any extra muscles in there, but a few things are off on the back (which isn't an uncommon thing even in drawings)
|
|
|
|
Post by pixellegolas on May 27, 2010 22:48:13 GMT 1
I don't know much about muscles but seems qutie correct and looks really good, now put the muscle fibres in |
|
|
|
Post by taron on May 27, 2010 23:22:43 GMT 1
Not a bad start, but some of the muscles seem to be going a bit into the wrong directions. What looks like the rips, for example, are not the rips, but in fact muscles (Serratus Anterior)that normally go nearly horizontally into the latissimus (Lattisimus Dorsi), the muscle from under the arms or side of the torso to the back. I'm not an expert, but I did some amount of examining the visible musclulator in a perfectly unacademical way, haha. Also, observe how muscles seem to weave in and out of each other, like baskets, if you know what I mean. Naturally those exact muscles are an excellent showcase for that, but for example, where the muscles from the back of the upper leg lead into the kneecap, the next muscle group towards the lower leg comes out from underneath them...again kind of like weaving. You do have the idea of it, but it looks rather like an illustration of that phenomenon instead of the actual shapes... anyway, it's getting there! That's a fun site, actually...just remembered that one: muscularsystem |
|
|
|
Post by tdachel on May 27, 2010 23:35:49 GMT 1
qwerty - I see some definite talent. Looking forward to seeing the completed work. When does the real fun begin (the hands)?
|
|
|
|
Post by qwerty on May 30, 2010 14:24:34 GMT 1
Wasa: I gess you speak about lack of muscles on scapula and triceps is kinda off right? pixellegolas: I'm afraid my machine would explode while making these Taron: I checked these Serratus Anterior, and looks like they come from back of scapula so they kinda radiate from bottom of it. I will remember about this. tdachel: here is the hand (but as new project). They are kinda my weakest spot as you can see:   thx for viewing. |
|
|
|
Post by michaelw on May 30, 2010 14:48:35 GMT 1
Very cool studies!
On teh hands, it's less clear whether you are still going for the underlying anatomy or for "with skin" now... i think it's the latter in which case I think these are very "emaciated" hands....
Once again tough, this is very "strong" work!
Bravo!
|
|
|
|
Post by quirkusmandible on May 30, 2010 15:59:24 GMT 1
the hands are awesome. cool stuff
|
|
|
|
Post by qwerty on May 31, 2010 10:50:42 GMT 1
thx, michaelw: this time I wanted more of old guys hand, just to show of some tendons, skin, wrinkles, veins ets. So you are right, its kinda emaciated, old hands.
quirkusmandible: thx, glad you liked it
|
|
|
|
Post by infiniview on May 31, 2010 11:11:50 GMT 1
Impressive, nice modeling!
|
|
|
|
Post by taron on May 31, 2010 13:43:30 GMT 1
Nice, spooky hands for sure! This is getting very exciting!  |
|
|
|
Post by nateowens on May 31, 2010 23:53:27 GMT 1
Nicely done! - Impressive is right
I got into some of the other 3d tools for a while, Silo, Zbrush... went to the forums, got really weary of the endless tirades and discussions about musculature/anatomy - - too medical for me.
10 fingers, 10 toes and a nose.
I like the Jack Davis anatomy course (from Mad Magazine)
|
|
|
|
Post by qwerty on Jun 1, 2010 19:15:59 GMT 1
|
|
